|
|
| Title and source |
| Full title: Holm perg 6 fol : Barlaams ok Josaphats saga : an electronic edition |
| Source: Holm perg 6 fol |
|
|
| Editor(s) and contributors |
|
Main editor(s):
Magnus Rindal, University of Bergen
|
|
Other contributors:
Jon Erik Hagen, University of Bergen (Lemmatisation and morphological encoding)
Odd Einar Haugen, University of Bergen (Lemmatisation and morphological encoding)
Christian Emil Ore, University of Oslo (Conversion to Menotic XML)
|
|
|
| Version and size |
| Version: 0.9.5 |
| Date of version: 31 March 2008 |
| Size: 76411 words |
|
|
| Publication details |
| Publisher: Medieval Nordic Text Archive. |
| Date of publication: 1 March 2004. |
| Menota ID: Ms. 1. |
|
|
| Copyright and availability |
| Copyright: |
| Availability: This text is available for purposes of academic research and teaching only. Re-distribution in any form without prior permission is prohibited. Short extracts may be cited with full acknowledgment of the source. |
|
|
| Contents |
| [Please see 'C' for content in the main table] |
|
|
| Manuscript description |
| Support: Parchment, but with five younger paper leaves added; two at the front (the last being blank) and three at the back. |
| Extent: 102 parchment leaves and 5 paper leaves; 210 mm (height) by 155 mm (width). |
| Foliation: The manuscript is paginated on the recto pages of the parchment leaves, 1–204. |
| Origin: Written in Eastern Norway c. 1275. |
|
|
| Quality control |
| Level: high |
| Status: This text was proofread by Magnus Rindal and colleagues before the publication of the printed version in 1981. It is unlikely that it contains any significant number of errors. However, it can not be ruled out that the subsequent conversion of the file may have introduced some systemic errors. |
|
|
| Textual levels |
| Level: |
| Description: This text has been encoded on a diplomatic level, according to the practice by Norsk Historisk kjeldeskrift-Institutt. |
|
|
| Lemmatisation and morphological analysis |
| Lemmatisation: |
| Morphological analysis: |
| Description: The complete text has been lemmatised and morphologically analysed according to the rules specified in ch. 8 of the Menota Handbook, v. 2.0. |
